fasadbath.blogg.se

The jungle book 1994 vs 2016
The jungle book 1994 vs 2016






the jungle book 1994 vs 2016

They corner him and attack him from different angles, trying to catch him off-guard.

  • Next the wolf pack takes on the tiger in a more tactical manner.
  • the jungle book 1994 vs 2016

    For a good while, it looks like the fight would be just between the two of them, Baloo poised such a serious challenge to Khan. And he did manage to pin down Shere Khan, though only briefly, and land a few good hits at the tiger. Though he goes down as quick as Bagheera did in his second fight against the tiger, the fact that Baloo held his own against the most feared and powerful predator in the whole jungle for as long as he did is pretty badass. What's also unique about this fight, is that Baloo's the only character whose physical strength matches Shere Khan's, which is a sight to behold. Especially awesome in comparison to the one-sided beatdown of the '67 version. All of them fight the tiger in a different manner, matching their species. Each of those fights deserve a mention, since all of them are willing to go toe on toe with the most feared predator in the jungle.

  • In the climax a bear, a panther and a pack of wolves fight Shere Khan.
  • In a World where everyone has claws, wings or a tough hide, how does a puny human child survive? By being smart - exactly how real humans got to the top of the food chain.

    the jungle book 1994 vs 2016

  • Mowgli escaping from Shere Khan by hitching a ride on one of the stampeding buffalo.
  • The sheer size of King Louie and the threat he poses to Mowgli.
  • It's one moment where he's significantly more badass than in the novel, where the panther was desperately fighting for his life, whereas here it didn't look as though he's about to give up anytime soon.
  • He also stood his ground against legions of Louie's monkeys.
  • And in the final fight he actually runs down the freaking tiger, to give Mowgli more time. He's also very strong by leopard-standards, jumping at an attacking tiger and hitting him with enough momentum to send them both flying a few feet away from Mowgli.
  • In his first fight with Shere Khan he makes good use of his agility and speed to evade the tigers claws and lands a few blows on him.
  • The fact that he faced off Shere Khan twice and still lives to tell the tale about it shows that his reputation is well earned.
  • Bagheera, while often being Overshadowed by Awesome (courtesy of Shere Khan), is one badass panther.
  • This actually scares the piss out of the monkey army for a minute. In particular, Baloo standing on his hind legs and roaring at the monkeys advancing towards him.
  • The monkeys swarming Baloo and Bagheera and the fight that follows.
  • If you guys find this thread dumb, I apologize. This also helps eliminate the possibility of discerning consumers looking at classic Disney animation and asking, "Why doesn't Disney animation look this good anymore?" I don't know if he or she is right or not, which I hope not, but I will ask this if it'll help me settle this for my ocd, is Disney really replacing classic animated features to live action remake films? Then they can lock them up in the Disney vault and not have to keep dragging them out every time someone invents a new home video format. I think they're remaking all their animated classics so that people will gradually forget about the original animated versions. There's even one time a deviantart user said this, Live action of Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast are lovely and the live action of The Jungle Book in 2016 is beautifully crafted which is the reason why it won an oscar for that, but I have a feeling that Disney wants to get rid of classic animated features or put them in the vault forever and never be re-released.

    #THE JUNGLE BOOK 1994 VS 2016 MOVIE#

    Now, I don't hate remakes, Maleficent is a good movie even though it has some flaws. I also starting not to like the idea of remaking The Lion King, because there are no humans in the movie. It seems like its becoming the norm right now and it's like Disney is replacing classic animated features into live action movie remakes.

    the jungle book 1994 vs 2016

    Okay, this maybe kind of stupid, but I'm kind of concern about Disney making classic animated features into live action remake movies.








    The jungle book 1994 vs 2016